Briljant vs AI Peekaboo (2026): Which Dutch GEO platform is better?

Key Takeaways

• Briljant is specifically built for the Dutch market with localized support and GDPR compliance, while AI Peekaboo targets a global audience with less regional focus
• Briljant offers transparent pricing at €49/month (€399/year) with a 7-day free trial; AI Peekaboo's pricing is not publicly disclosed but estimated around $49-79/month
• Both platforms test thousands of prompts monthly, but Briljant explicitly states 3,000 prompts per month while AI Peekaboo's prompt volume is unclear
• Neither platform offers the content gap analysis, AI crawler logs, or content generation capabilities found in more comprehensive platforms like Promptwatch
• Briljant includes technical audits and GEO optimization features; AI Peekaboo focuses primarily on monitoring and dashboards
• For Dutch businesses needing local support and EU data compliance, Briljant is the clearer choice; for agencies managing international clients, AI Peekaboo's multi-client dashboard may have an edge

Overview

Briljant

Briljant

Dutch GEO platform tracking AI visibility in ChatGPT and Perplexity

View more

Briljant is a Netherlands-based Generative Engine Optimization platform designed specifically for Dutch businesses and agencies. It monitors brand visibility across ChatGPT, Google AI, and Perplexity, testing 3,000 prompts monthly to track where and how AI models mention your brand. The platform emphasizes technical audits and content optimization to improve AI discoverability, with a clear focus on the European market and GDPR compliance. Trusted by 300+ Dutch companies including Domino's, Easytoys, and Expert, Briljant positions itself as a localized alternative to global enterprise platforms.

AI Peekaboo

AI Peekaboo

Track brand mentions across ChatGPT and Perplexity with basic monitoring

View more

AI Peekaboo (often just called Peekaboo) is a basic AI visibility monitoring tool that tracks brand mentions across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. It offers simple dashboards and multi-client management features aimed at agencies and brands. The platform focuses on showing you when and how AI models mention your brand, but lacks deeper optimization capabilities like content gap analysis, AI crawler logs, or prompt intelligence. Pricing is not publicly disclosed, though market positioning suggests it starts around $49-79/month.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Head-to-head feature analysis

AI model coverage

Briljant tracks three major AI platforms: ChatGPT, Google AI, and Perplexity. This covers the most commercially relevant AI search engines for European markets, where Google AI and ChatGPT dominate usage.

AI Peekaboo casts a slightly wider net with five AI models: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode. The inclusion of both Google AI Overviews and Google AI Mode gives more granular visibility into Google's AI ecosystem.

Verdict: AI Peekaboo has broader coverage, but for most Dutch businesses, Briljant's three-platform focus hits the essential targets. The extra models in Peekaboo matter more if you're tracking global markets where Gemini usage is higher.

Prompt testing and monitoring

Briljant explicitly states it tests 3,000 prompts per month as part of its Pro plan. This gives you a clear understanding of monitoring capacity -- you know exactly how many queries the platform is checking for your brand mentions.

AI Peekaboo does not publicly disclose prompt volumes. The website shows a prompt selection interface but doesn't specify how many prompts you can track or how often they're tested. This lack of transparency makes it harder to evaluate whether the platform will scale with your needs.

Verdict: Briljant wins on transparency. Knowing you get 3,000 monthly prompt tests lets you plan your monitoring strategy. AI Peekaboo's opaque prompt limits are a red flag.

Optimization and actionability

Briljant includes a "GEO Optimizer" feature that provides technical and content optimization recommendations. The platform also offers technical audits to identify why AI models might not be discovering or citing your content. This positions Briljant as more than just a monitoring dashboard -- it helps you fix visibility gaps.

AI Peekaboo focuses on monitoring and analytics. You can see your AI visibility score and track when brands get mentioned, but the platform doesn't appear to offer content gap analysis, technical audits, or optimization recommendations. It shows you the problem but doesn't help you solve it.

For context, platforms like Promptwatch take optimization further with Answer Gap Analysis (showing exactly which prompts competitors rank for but you don't) and built-in AI content generation to create articles engineered for AI citations. Neither Briljant nor AI Peekaboo reach that level.

Promptwatch

Track and optimize your brand visibility in AI search engines

View more

Verdict: Briljant has a meaningful edge here. The GEO Optimizer and technical audits give you actionable next steps, not just data. AI Peekaboo is monitoring-only.

Pricing and transparency

Briljant's pricing is fully transparent: €49/month or €399/year (roughly €33/month on annual billing). You get a 7-day free trial to test the platform. The pricing page clearly lists what's included: 3,000 prompts/month, ChatGPT/Google AI/Perplexity tracking, AI analytics, competitor comparison, and the GEO Optimizer.

AI Peekaboo does not publicly disclose pricing. The website mentions a 7-day free trial but requires you to contact sales or sign up to see costs. Based on market positioning and competitor analysis, estimates put it around $49-79/month, but this is speculative.

Verdict: Briljant's transparent pricing is a major advantage. Hidden pricing wastes time and signals the vendor wants to negotiate case-by-case, which is frustrating for small businesses.

Regional focus and compliance

Briljant is built for the Dutch market. The entire interface is in Dutch, support is localized, and the platform emphasizes GDPR compliance -- critical for European businesses handling customer data. The client list (Domino's Netherlands, Easytoys, Expert, UMCG, Corendon) confirms strong traction in the Benelux region.

AI Peekaboo targets a global audience with an English-first interface. There's no mention of GDPR compliance, EU data residency, or localized support for specific markets. This makes it a better fit for international agencies managing clients across multiple countries, but less ideal for Dutch businesses that need local support and regulatory compliance.

Verdict: If you're a Dutch business or agency serving Dutch clients, Briljant is the obvious choice. If you're managing international clients and need a single platform across regions, AI Peekaboo's global approach may fit better.

Agency and multi-client features

AI Peekaboo explicitly markets multi-client management as a core feature, making it easier for agencies to track multiple brands from a single dashboard. This is a practical advantage if you're managing 5-10 clients and need to switch between accounts quickly.

Briljant does not prominently advertise multi-client or white-label features, though it does market to agencies. The focus seems to be on in-house marketing teams and individual businesses rather than agencies juggling dozens of clients.

Verdict: AI Peekaboo has the edge for agencies with many clients. Briljant works for agencies but feels more tailored to in-house teams.

Analytics and reporting

Briljant provides "AI analytics & rapportage" (AI analytics and reporting) as part of its Pro plan. The platform tracks AI traffic and visibility scores, letting you see how your brand presence in AI search changes over time. Competitor comparison is also included, so you can benchmark against rivals.

AI Peekaboo offers "AI visibility scores" and dashboards showing when and how AI models mention your brand. The website emphasizes simplicity -- you can quickly see if your brand is being recommended or not. However, there's no mention of traffic attribution, advanced reporting, or competitor benchmarking.

Neither platform offers the depth of analytics found in tools like Promptwatch, which includes AI crawler logs (real-time tracking of which pages ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity are reading on your site), page-level citation tracking, and traffic attribution via code snippet or Google Search Console integration.

Verdict: Briljant's analytics are more comprehensive, especially with competitor comparison built in. AI Peekaboo's dashboards are simpler but less informative.

Pros and cons

Briljant pros

• Transparent pricing (€49/mo or €399/yr)
• 3,000 prompts tested per month (clearly stated)
• GEO Optimizer provides actionable technical and content recommendations
• Built for Dutch market with localized support and GDPR compliance
• Competitor comparison included
• Trusted by 300+ Dutch companies

Briljant cons

• Limited to three AI models (ChatGPT, Google AI, Perplexity)
• No AI crawler logs or content gap analysis
• Less suited for international agencies managing global clients
• No content generation or advanced optimization features

AI Peekaboo pros

• Tracks five AI models (broader coverage)
• Multi-client management for agencies
• Simple, easy-to-understand dashboards
• 7-day free trial available

AI Peekaboo cons

• Pricing not publicly disclosed (requires sales contact)
• No technical audits or optimization features
• Prompt volume limits unclear
• No GDPR compliance or EU-specific features mentioned
• Monitoring-only -- doesn't help you fix visibility gaps
• No AI crawler logs, content gap analysis, or traffic attribution

Who should pick which tool

Choose Briljant if:

• You're a Dutch business or agency serving the Netherlands/Benelux market
• You need GDPR compliance and EU data residency
• You want transparent pricing without sales calls
• You value technical audits and optimization recommendations, not just monitoring
• You need to track 3,000+ prompts per month and want that capacity clearly stated
• You want local support in Dutch

Choose AI Peekaboo if:

• You're an agency managing multiple international clients and need multi-client dashboards
• You want to track five AI models instead of three (Gemini, Google AI Overviews, Google AI Mode matter to you)
• You prefer a simple monitoring dashboard without optimization complexity
• You're comfortable with undisclosed pricing and sales-driven onboarding

Consider Promptwatch if:

• You need the full optimization loop: find content gaps, generate AI-optimized content, track results
• You want AI crawler logs showing exactly which pages ChatGPT and Perplexity are reading on your site
• You need traffic attribution to connect AI visibility to actual revenue
• You're tracking 10+ AI models (Promptwatch covers ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Meta AI, Mistral, Copilot, Google AI Overviews)
• You want prompt intelligence (volume estimates, difficulty scores, query fan-outs) to prioritize high-value prompts

Final verdict

For Dutch businesses and agencies, Briljant is the better choice. The transparent pricing, localized support, GDPR compliance, and GEO Optimizer make it a practical tool for improving AI visibility in the Netherlands. You know exactly what you're paying (€49/month) and what you're getting (3,000 prompts, three AI models, technical audits). The 300+ Dutch clients -- including recognizable brands like Domino's and Expert -- signal real traction in the market.

AI Peekaboo has merit for international agencies that need multi-client management and broader AI model coverage, but the lack of pricing transparency and optimization features are dealbreakers for most in-house teams. It's a monitoring dashboard, not an optimization platform.

Neither tool reaches the depth of platforms like Promptwatch, which combine monitoring with content gap analysis, AI-generated articles, and crawler logs. If you're serious about ranking in AI search -- not just tracking where you show up today -- you need a platform that helps you create the content AI models want to cite. Briljant gets you partway there with its GEO Optimizer; AI Peekaboo leaves you stuck at the monitoring stage.