Key takeaways
- Peec AI starts at $95/mo with a free trial; Amionai's cheapest plan is $375/mo for agencies managing 5 clients -- so for a single brand, Peec AI is dramatically more affordable.
- Both tools are monitoring-only. Neither generates content, provides crawler logs, or attributes AI traffic to revenue. You'll see the data, but you're on your own to act on it.
- Amionai covers more AI models out of the box, including Claude and Google AI Overviews in all plans. Peec AI tracks ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini.
- Amionai is built for agencies: white-label reports, multi-client dashboards, and weekly action plans. Peec AI is built for in-house marketing teams at individual brands.
- Peec AI's metrics are more granular -- visibility score, position ranking, and sentiment are all tracked separately. Amionai leans more on citation gap analysis and actionable recommendations.
- If you want to actually fix your AI visibility (not just watch it), neither tool gets you there. Platforms like Promptwatch add content generation and gap analysis on top of monitoring.
Overview
Peec AI
Peec AI is a clean, focused AI search analytics tool aimed at marketing teams who want to track how their brand performs across AI platforms. The core metrics -- visibility (share of chats where you're mentioned), position (where you rank in AI responses), and sentiment (how AI describes your brand) -- are well-defined and easy to read. It's trusted by 2,000+ marketing teams and has a freemium model that makes it easy to try before committing.
The experience is polished. You set up prompts, tag them, and watch your brand's performance over time across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini. Competitor benchmarking is included. What you won't find: content recommendations, crawler data, or any way to connect AI visibility to actual website traffic.
Am I on AI (Amionai)
Amionai (branded as "Am I on AI?") takes a slightly different angle. It's positioned as an agency platform first, with white-label capabilities and multi-client management built in from the start. The platform tracks brand mentions across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews, and other LLMs, and it generates weekly action plans telling you what to do to improve your rankings.
The free AI visibility audit on their homepage is a nice entry point -- you scan your website and get a snapshot of where you stand. But ongoing monitoring requires a paid plan, and the pricing is structured around agencies (5 or 10 clients per plan), which makes it awkward for a single brand trying to monitor just their own presence.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | Peec AI | Amionai |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $95/mo | $375/mo (5 clients) |
| Free trial | Yes | No (one-time free audit only) |
| Target user | In-house marketing teams | Agencies |
| AI models tracked | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Google AI Overviews + others |
| Visibility score | Yes | Yes |
| Position tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sentiment analysis | Yes | Limited |
| Competitor benchmarking | Yes | Yes |
| Citation gap analysis | No | Yes (basic) |
| Weekly action plans | No | Yes |
| White-label reporting | No | Yes |
| Multi-client management | No | Yes (5 or 10 clients) |
| Content generation | No | No |
| Crawler logs | No | No |
| Traffic attribution | No | No |
| Reddit/YouTube tracking | No | No |
| Custom prompts | Yes | Yes |
| Country/language targeting | Yes | Yes |
| API access | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
Head-to-head feature deep-dive
Pricing and access
This is where the two tools diverge most sharply.
Peec AI uses a freemium model. There's a free trial (no credit card required), and paid plans start at $95/mo. That's a reasonable entry point for a single brand or a small marketing team. You're paying for ongoing monitoring, not a one-time audit.
Amionai's pricing is structured entirely around agencies. The cheapest plan is $375/mo for 5 client accounts, and $670/mo for 10 clients. If you're a single brand, you're either paying for capacity you don't need or you're not the intended customer. There's no free trial -- just a free one-time website scan that gives you a snapshot of your current AI visibility.
Verdict: Peec AI wins for individual brands. Amionai only makes financial sense if you're an agency managing multiple clients.
AI model coverage
| Model | Peec AI | Amionai |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | Yes | Yes |
| Perplexity | Yes | Yes |
| Gemini | Yes | Not confirmed |
| Google AI Overviews | No | Yes (all plans) |
| Claude | No | Yes |
| DeepSeek | No | Not confirmed |
| Grok | No | Not confirmed |
| Copilot | No | Not confirmed |
Amionai has broader model coverage, particularly with Claude and Google AI Overviews included in all plans. Google AI Overviews is increasingly important as Google's AI-generated summaries now appear at the top of search results for a huge share of queries -- so this matters.
Peec AI covers the three most-used AI platforms (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini) but misses Claude entirely, which is a gap given Claude's growing usage.
Verdict: Amionai covers more ground, especially with Google AI Overviews and Claude.
Core analytics and metrics
Peec AI's three-metric framework (visibility, position, sentiment) is genuinely useful and clearly defined. Visibility tells you the share of relevant conversations where your brand appears. Position tells you where you rank within those responses. Sentiment tells you whether the AI is saying positive, neutral, or negative things about you. These are tracked over time with trend charts, and you can benchmark against competitors.
Amionai focuses more on citation gap analysis -- identifying where competitors are being cited and you're not. It also generates weekly action plans, which sounds helpful but in practice tends to be fairly generic recommendations ("publish more content about X topic") without the depth of a proper content brief.
Neither tool tells you which pages on your site are being cited, how often AI crawlers visit, or how AI visibility connects to actual traffic. They both stop at the monitoring layer.
Verdict: Peec AI has cleaner, more granular metrics. Amionai's action plans add a layer of guidance, but it's surface-level.
Agency and multi-client features
This is Amionai's strongest differentiator. White-label reporting means agencies can send clients branded reports without the Amionai name appearing. Multi-client dashboards let you manage 5 or 10 brands from a single account. If you're running an agency and need to report on AI visibility for multiple clients, Amionai is built for that workflow.
Peec AI has no white-label capability and no multi-client management. It's a single-brand tool. Agencies could use it, but they'd need separate accounts for each client, which gets expensive and messy fast.
Verdict: Amionai wins for agencies, clearly.
Ease of setup and UX
Peec AI's interface is clean and well-designed. The dashboard shows your key metrics at a glance, you can organize prompts with tags, and the competitor benchmarking view is easy to read. Setup is straightforward -- add your brand, add prompts, and you're tracking within minutes.
Amionai's entry point is the free website scan, which is a smart onboarding hook. The ongoing dashboard is less publicly documented, but the weekly action plan delivery suggests a more report-driven experience rather than a live dashboard you check daily.
Verdict: Peec AI has a more polished self-serve experience. Amionai's workflow is more report-centric.
What neither tool does
Worth being direct about this: both tools are monitoring dashboards. They show you data. They don't help you act on it in any meaningful way.
No content generation. No crawler logs showing which pages AI models are actually reading. No traffic attribution connecting AI citations to website visits or revenue. No prompt difficulty scoring to help you prioritize which keywords to target.
If you're looking for a platform that closes the loop from "I see I'm invisible" to "here's the content I need to create and here's proof it worked," neither of these gets you there. Platforms like Promptwatch are built around that full cycle -- find gaps, generate content, track results.
Pricing comparison
| Plan | Peec AI | Amionai |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | Free trial (no CC required) | Free one-time audit only |
| Entry paid plan | ~$95/mo | $375/mo (5 clients) |
| Mid-tier | Not publicly detailed | $670/mo (10 clients) |
| Enterprise/custom | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
| Annual discount | Not confirmed | Not confirmed |
The pricing gap is stark. For a single brand, Peec AI is the obvious choice on cost alone. For an agency with 5+ clients, Amionai's $375/mo works out to $75/client -- which is actually reasonable if you're billing clients for AI visibility reporting.
Pros and cons
Peec AI
Pros:
- Affordable entry point ($95/mo) with a genuine free trial
- Clean three-metric framework (visibility, position, sentiment) that's easy to understand
- Good competitor benchmarking
- Trusted by 2,000+ marketing teams
- Custom prompts with tag organization
- Country-level tracking
Cons:
- Only covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini -- no Claude, no Google AI Overviews
- No content generation or optimization features
- No crawler logs or traffic attribution
- Not built for agencies or multi-client use
- Monitoring-only -- you see the data but have to figure out what to do with it yourself
Amionai
Pros:
- Broader model coverage including Claude and Google AI Overviews
- White-label reporting for agencies
- Multi-client management (5 or 10 clients per plan)
- Weekly action plans provide some guidance
- Free one-time AI visibility audit is a useful starting point
- Citation gap analysis included
Cons:
- Expensive for single brands -- entry plan is $375/mo for 5 clients
- No free trial for ongoing monitoring
- Action plans tend to be generic rather than deeply actionable
- No content generation, crawler logs, or traffic attribution
- Less transparent about dashboard UX and feature depth
- Smaller, less established user base than Peec AI
Who should pick which tool
Pick Peec AI if:
- You're an in-house marketing team at a single brand
- Budget matters and you want to start small and scale
- You want clean, granular metrics (visibility, position, sentiment) with trend tracking
- You want to try before you buy -- the free trial is a real advantage
- Your priority AI platforms are ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Gemini
Pick Amionai if:
- You're a digital agency managing AI visibility for multiple clients
- White-label reporting is a requirement for your client relationships
- You need Claude and Google AI Overviews tracking included from day one
- You're comfortable with a more report-driven workflow rather than a live dashboard
- The per-client economics work out for your agency pricing model
Final verdict
These two tools serve genuinely different audiences, which makes the comparison less about "which is better" and more about "which fits your situation."
For a single brand or in-house team, Peec AI is the clear pick. It's cheaper, has a free trial, and the UX is cleaner. The model coverage gap (no Claude, no Google AI Overviews) is a real limitation, but for most teams starting out with AI visibility tracking, ChatGPT and Perplexity are where the volume is.
For agencies, Amionai makes more sense -- the white-label and multi-client features are things Peec AI simply doesn't offer, and the per-client pricing is defensible if you're billing clients for this work.
The honest caveat for both: if you're serious about improving your AI visibility rather than just watching it, you'll eventually hit the ceiling of what either tool can do. Both stop at monitoring. Acting on the data requires something more.