Key takeaways
- AEO Engine is a managed service (an agency, essentially), not a SaaS tool you log into. Briljant is a self-serve platform. That's the most important distinction before anything else.
- The price gap is enormous: Briljant costs €49/month; AEO Engine starts at $797/month. You're comparing a budget monitoring tool to a full-service optimization retainer.
- Briljant is built specifically for Dutch and European businesses -- Dutch-language interface, GDPR compliance, local support. AEO Engine is English-only and globally oriented.
- AEO Engine claims 920% average AI traffic growth across campaigns, which sounds impressive but reflects their managed work, not just the software. Briljant gives you the data; you do the work.
- If you want someone to handle AI visibility for you and have the budget, AEO Engine makes sense. If you want to monitor and learn yourself at low cost, Briljant is the practical choice.
- Neither tool is a direct apples-to-apples comparison -- they serve fundamentally different buyer types.
Overview
AEO Engine

AEO Engine positions itself as a results-oriented AI visibility company for "ambitious brands." The website is heavy on outcome claims -- 920% average traffic growth, 50+ ecommerce and B2B clients -- and the product is structured as a managed service with three tiers: Local ($797/mo), Growth ($1,597/mo), and Aggressive ($2,997/mo). You're not buying software access; you're buying a team that does the work. Their client list skews toward ecommerce brands (Morph Costumes, Smartish, Opposuits) and some B2B companies.
The pitch is straightforward: AI is replacing traditional search, early movers win, and AEO Engine will get you cited by ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, and Perplexity before your competitors figure out what's happening. Whether that holds up depends heavily on execution quality, which is hard to verify from the outside.
Briljant
Briljant is a Netherlands-based GEO platform aimed at Dutch businesses and agencies. At €49/month (or €399/year, which works out to €33/month), it's priced for SMBs and freelancers who want to understand their AI visibility without committing to an agency retainer. The platform tests 3,000 prompts per month, tracks visibility across ChatGPT, Google AI, and Perplexity, and includes competitor comparison and some optimization guidance.
The interface is in Dutch, the support is local, and the client list includes recognizable Dutch brands: Domino's (NL), Corendon, UMCG, and Easytoys. It's a monitoring-first tool -- it tells you what's happening in AI search for your brand, but the optimization work is yours to do.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | AEO Engine | Briljant |
|---|---|---|
| Product type | Managed service / agency | Self-serve SaaS platform |
| Starting price | $797/month | €49/month (€399/year) |
| Free trial | Free audit + strategy call | 7-day free trial |
| Language | English | Dutch |
| Target market | Global (ecommerce + B2B) | Netherlands / Europe |
| AI engines monitored | ChatGPT, Google AI, Perplexity | ChatGPT, Google AI, Perplexity, Gemini |
| Prompt testing volume | Not publicly specified | 3,000 prompts/month |
| Content optimization | Done-for-you by team | Guidance only (DIY) |
| Competitor analysis | Yes | Yes |
| Technical audit | Yes | Yes |
| GDPR compliance | Not specified | Yes |
| Self-serve dashboard | Limited (managed workflow) | Yes |
| Reporting | Campaign-style reports | AI analytics dashboard |
| Client count | 50+ brands | 300+ businesses |
Head-to-head feature deep-dive
Service model
This is where the two tools diverge completely. AEO Engine is not a platform you log into and explore. It's a service where their team analyzes your brand, builds an AI visibility strategy, creates and optimizes content, and reports back on results. Think of it like hiring an SEO agency, except the focus is on AI search.
Briljant is the opposite. You sign up, connect your brand, and the platform starts monitoring your AI visibility. You get a dashboard, prompt tracking data, and optimization recommendations. What you do with that information is entirely up to you.
Neither model is inherently better -- they suit different buyers. A small Dutch marketing team that wants to track AI visibility themselves will find Briljant perfectly adequate. A mid-market ecommerce brand that wants someone else to handle the whole thing and is willing to pay for it will find AEO Engine more appealing.
Verdict: Depends entirely on whether you want to do the work yourself or outsource it.
Pricing
| Plan | AEO Engine | Briljant |
|---|---|---|
| Free / trial | Free audit + strategy call | 7-day free trial |
| Entry-level | $797/month (Local) | €49/month / €399/year |
| Mid-tier | $1,597/month (Growth) | -- |
| Top tier | $2,997/month (Aggressive) | -- |
| Enterprise | Custom | Not listed |
The price difference is stark. AEO Engine's cheapest plan costs roughly 16x more than Briljant's Pro plan. That's not a fair comparison in isolation -- AEO Engine includes human labor, strategy, and execution. But if you're a small business or agency trying to get started with GEO monitoring, $797/month is a serious commitment. Briljant's €399/year is a rounding error by comparison.
Verdict: Briljant wins on price by a wide margin. AEO Engine's cost is justified only if the managed service delivers measurable results.
AI engine coverage
Both tools cover the three engines that matter most right now: ChatGPT, Google AI (Overviews and Gemini), and Perplexity. Briljant explicitly lists Gemini as a separate tracked engine. AEO Engine's coverage details aren't broken down publicly -- their managed approach means the team decides which engines to target based on your campaign.
Neither tool appears to cover the full breadth of AI engines that more comprehensive platforms track (DeepSeek, Grok, Claude, Meta AI, Copilot, Mistral). For most businesses in 2026, ChatGPT and Google AI are where the volume is, so this isn't a dealbreaker for either.
Verdict: Roughly equal for the mainstream engines. Neither covers the long tail of AI models.
Prompt tracking and monitoring
Briljant tests 3,000 prompts per month -- that's a concrete, published number. You can track which prompts surface your brand, compare against competitors, and see trends over time. The monitoring is automated and ongoing.
AEO Engine doesn't publish specific prompt volumes or monitoring specs. As a managed service, the team presumably tracks relevant prompts as part of campaign management, but you don't get a self-serve dashboard showing you live prompt data.
Verdict: Briljant is more transparent here. If you want to see the raw monitoring data yourself, Briljant gives you that. AEO Engine keeps it inside their managed workflow.
Content optimization
This is where AEO Engine has a genuine advantage -- if you trust their execution. Their team writes and optimizes content specifically to get cited by AI models. That's the core of what you're paying for at $797-$2,997/month. The 920% traffic growth claim, if accurate, reflects this hands-on content work.
Briljant provides optimization guidance -- technical audits, content recommendations -- but stops short of creating content for you. It's more of a "here's what you should fix" tool than a "we'll fix it for you" service.
Verdict: AEO Engine wins on content execution. Briljant wins on cost if you're capable of acting on the recommendations yourself.
Geographic and language fit
Briljant is clearly built for the Dutch market. The website is in Dutch, the support is local, and the client list is full of Dutch brands. For a business operating in the Netherlands or Belgium, that's a real advantage -- localized prompts, Dutch-language AI responses, GDPR-compliant data handling, and support in your own language.
AEO Engine operates in English and targets a global audience, with a noticeable lean toward US and UK ecommerce. If you're a Dutch SMB, the language and localization gap with AEO Engine is real.
Verdict: Briljant for Dutch/European businesses. AEO Engine for English-language markets.
Reporting and analytics
Briljant has a self-serve analytics dashboard with real-time AI visibility tracking, prompt-level data, and competitor comparisons. You can see trends, export data, and share reports with clients if you're an agency.
AEO Engine delivers campaign-style reports as part of the managed service. You're not pulling your own data -- you're receiving reports from their team. That works fine if you trust the team, but it means less visibility into the raw numbers.
Verdict: Briljant gives you more direct access to your own data. AEO Engine's reporting is filtered through their managed workflow.
Pros and cons
AEO Engine
Pros:
- Fully managed -- no need to learn the tools or do the work yourself
- Hands-on content creation and optimization included
- Strong outcome claims (920% traffic growth) with real client testimonials
- Good fit for ecommerce brands that want AI visibility without internal expertise
- Free strategy call and audit to evaluate fit before committing
Cons:
- Expensive -- $797/month minimum is a significant commitment
- No self-serve dashboard or real-time data access
- Transparency is limited -- prompt volumes, methodology, and platform specs aren't published
- English-only, US/global focus
- You're dependent on their team's quality; hard to evaluate before signing up
- No free trial of the actual service
Briljant
Pros:
- Very affordable at €49/month or €399/year
- 7-day free trial with no commitment
- Self-serve dashboard with real-time data
- 3,000 prompts tested monthly -- concrete, transparent spec
- Built for Dutch/European market with GDPR compliance
- Good for agencies managing multiple clients
- 300+ businesses already using it
Cons:
- Monitoring-first -- optimization is your responsibility
- No content generation or done-for-you work
- Smaller feature set compared to enterprise GEO platforms
- Dutch-language interface may not suit international teams
- Limited AI engine coverage beyond the top three
Who should pick which tool
Pick AEO Engine if:
- You have a marketing budget of $800-$3,000/month and want someone else to handle AI visibility
- You're an ecommerce or B2B brand in an English-speaking market
- You don't have internal expertise in GEO/AEO and want a managed outcome
- You're willing to trust a team's execution and wait for campaign results
Pick Briljant if:
- You're a Dutch or European business that needs localized AI monitoring
- You want to start tracking AI visibility without a large budget
- You have an in-house team capable of acting on optimization recommendations
- You're an agency that wants to offer AI visibility reporting to clients at low cost
- You want to explore GEO before committing to a more expensive solution
A note on the broader GEO landscape
Both tools cover the monitoring basics, but neither gives you the full picture of what's possible in 2026. If you want to go deeper -- tracking AI crawler activity on your site, understanding prompt volumes and difficulty scores, generating content grounded in citation data, or monitoring how your brand appears in ChatGPT Shopping -- Promptwatch covers all of that in one platform, starting at $99/month.

It's worth knowing about, especially if you find yourself outgrowing Briljant's monitoring-only approach or want more transparency than AEO Engine's managed service provides.
Final verdict
AEO Engine and Briljant are not really competing for the same customer. AEO Engine is an agency retainer for brands that want managed AI visibility and have the budget for it. Briljant is a low-cost monitoring tool for Dutch businesses and agencies that want to track AI search visibility themselves.
If you're in the Netherlands and want to start understanding your AI visibility without a big spend, Briljant is the obvious starting point. If you're an English-language brand with real budget and no internal GEO expertise, AEO Engine's managed approach might be worth the cost -- but get the free audit first and ask hard questions about what's actually included before signing anything.
