Authoritas AI Tracker vs Goodie AI (2026): Which AI visibility platform is worth your money?

Key Takeaways

• Goodie AI appears to be defunct (domain is for sale as of February 2026) -- making Authoritas the only viable option by default
• Authoritas combines AI search monitoring with traditional SEO tools starting at £99/mo, while Goodie AI's last known pricing was $399/mo for basic monitoring only
• Authoritas tracks 7+ AI models (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Google AI Overviews, Bing AI) with competitive benchmarking and sentiment analysis
• Neither platform offers content gap analysis or AI content generation -- they're monitoring dashboards, not optimization platforms
• For brands serious about improving AI visibility (not just tracking it), tools like Promptwatch fill the optimization gap with Answer Gap Analysis, AI content generation, and crawler log tracking
• Authoritas is built for eCommerce brands, publishers, and agencies; Goodie AI targeted a similar audience but never gained significant traction

Overview

Authoritas AI Tracker

Authoritas AI Tracker

Track brand visibility across AI search engines and traditio

View more

Authoritas is a UK-based SEO platform that added AI search monitoring capabilities in 2024-2025. It tracks brand mentions, sentiment, and visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Google AI Overviews, and Bing AI. The platform combines traditional SEO tools (rank tracking, backlink analysis, technical audits) with AI search monitoring in a single interface. Pricing starts at £99/mo for the Essential plan and scales to £799/mo for Expert, with custom enterprise pricing available. Target users are eCommerce brands, publishers, and agencies managing competitive niches with global reach.

Goodie AI

Goodie AI

A basic AI visibility tracker missing critical optimization features

View more

Goodie AI was a basic AI visibility tracker that monitored brand mentions across ChatGPT, Perplexity, and a limited set of LLMs. As of February 2026, the goodie.ai domain is listed for sale at $80,000 on Spaceship.com, suggesting the company has shut down or pivoted away from the AI monitoring space. Last known pricing was $399/mo. The platform lacked critical features like AI crawler logs, content gap analysis, prompt intelligence, and optimization tools -- positioning it as a monitoring-only dashboard without actionable insights.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Head-to-head feature deep-dive

Platform viability and market presence

This comparison has an elephant in the room: Goodie AI's domain is currently listed for sale, which strongly suggests the company is no longer operating. I checked the live website data and found a Spaceship.com domain sale page asking $80,000 for goodie.ai. No active product, no login page, no company information.

Authoritas, by contrast, is an established SEO platform (founded pre-2020) that added AI search monitoring as the market shifted. The company actively maintains its platform, publishes regular updates, and has a visible customer base including eCommerce brands and agencies.

Verdict: Authoritas wins by default. You can't buy a product that doesn't exist.

AI model coverage

Authoritas tracks seven major AI platforms: Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT (GPT-4o variants), Perplexity (Sonar models), Bing AI/Copilot, Claude 3.5, Gemini 1.5, and DeepSeek. The platform shows which models cite your brand, how often, and in what context. You can filter by model to see where you're strong vs invisible.

Goodie AI's last known coverage included ChatGPT, Perplexity, and a few other LLMs -- exact list unclear from archived materials. No evidence it tracked Google AI Overviews, DeepSeek, or the full range of models that Authoritas covers.

Verdict: Authoritas covers more ground. If you're tracking AI visibility, you need to monitor Google AI Overviews (massive reach) and the full LLM landscape. Partial coverage leaves blind spots.

Traditional SEO integration

Authoritas bundles AI search monitoring with a full SEO platform: rank tracking across 170+ countries, backlink analysis, technical site audits, keyword research, and content optimization. You get one dashboard for both traditional search and AI search. This matters because AI models often cite pages that already rank well in Google -- the two channels reinforce each other.

Goodie AI was AI-monitoring-only. No rank tracking, no backlink tools, no technical SEO. If you wanted traditional SEO data, you'd need a separate subscription to Ahrefs, Semrush, or similar.

Verdict: Authoritas wins for teams that need both. The bundled approach saves money and keeps data in one place. If you only care about AI search and already have SEO tools, the bundling is less relevant -- but Goodie AI isn't available anyway.

Competitive intelligence and benchmarking

Authoritas shows share of voice vs competitors across AI models. You can see which brands dominate specific query categories, track sentiment trends over time, and identify where competitors are cited but you're not. The platform lets you add competitor domains and compare visibility side-by-side.

Goodie AI had basic competitor tracking (from what limited documentation exists), but no detailed share of voice metrics or sentiment analysis.

Verdict: Authoritas provides deeper competitive insights. Share of voice is critical for understanding your position in the AI search landscape -- raw mention counts don't tell the full story.

Pricing and value

Authoritas pricing:

• Essential: £99/mo (1 project, AI + SEO basics)
• Professional: £299/mo (3 projects, more keywords and prompts)
• Expert: £799/mo (10 projects, full feature set)
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Goodie AI's last known pricing was $399/mo for basic AI monitoring with no SEO tools included.

Doing the currency conversion (£99 ≈ $125 USD), Authoritas Essential costs roughly 1/3 of Goodie AI's price while including traditional SEO tools that Goodie AI lacked entirely. Even Authoritas Professional at £299 (~$375 USD) is cheaper than Goodie AI and offers far more functionality.

Verdict: Authoritas delivers better value at every tier. Goodie AI was overpriced for what it offered.

What both platforms are missing

Neither Authoritas nor Goodie AI helps you improve your AI visibility -- they just show you the current state. You see the data, then you're on your own to figure out what to do about it.

Specifically, both lack:

• AI crawler logs: No visibility into which pages AI models are actually reading from your site, how often they crawl, or what errors they encounter
• Content gap analysis: No identification of prompts where competitors are cited but you're not, or topics your site is missing
• AI content generation: No tools to create content optimized for AI citation
• Prompt intelligence: No volume estimates, difficulty scores, or query fan-outs to prioritize high-value prompts

This is where platforms like Promptwatch differentiate themselves -- they close the loop from monitoring to action.

Promptwatch

Track and optimize your brand visibility in AI search engines

View more

Promptwatch shows you exactly which prompts competitors rank for but you don't (Answer Gap Analysis), then helps you generate content engineered to get cited by AI models. You also get AI crawler logs showing which pages ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity are reading, plus prompt volumes and difficulty scoring to prioritize your efforts. It's the difference between a dashboard that shows problems and a platform that helps you fix them.

User interface and reporting

Authoritas uses a traditional enterprise SEO interface -- lots of data tables, filters, and export options. The AI search module sits alongside rank tracking and other SEO tools. Learning curve is moderate if you're familiar with SEO platforms. Reporting is robust with scheduled exports and white-label options for agencies.

Goodie AI's interface (from archived screenshots) was simpler and more focused, but also more limited in customization and filtering.

Verdict: Authoritas offers more depth for power users and agencies. Goodie AI was easier to learn but less flexible.

Pricing comparison

Pros and cons

Authoritas AI Tracker pros

• Combines AI search monitoring with traditional SEO tools in one platform
• Tracks 7+ AI models including Google AI Overviews and DeepSeek
• Competitive benchmarking with share of voice metrics
• Sentiment analysis for brand mentions
• Significantly cheaper than Goodie AI was
• Active development and regular updates
• Established company with visible customer base

Authoritas AI Tracker cons

• No AI crawler logs to see what AI models are reading from your site
• No content gap analysis or optimization tools -- monitoring only
• No AI content generation capabilities
• Learning curve for users unfamiliar with enterprise SEO platforms
• Pricing scales quickly for agencies managing many clients

Goodie AI pros

• Simpler interface (when it existed)
• Focused specifically on AI search without SEO clutter

Goodie AI cons

• Platform appears to be defunct (domain for sale as of Feb 2026)
• Was significantly more expensive than Authoritas for fewer features
• Lacked traditional SEO tools, requiring separate subscriptions
• No AI crawler logs, content gap analysis, or optimization features
• Limited AI model coverage compared to competitors
• No sentiment analysis or advanced competitive metrics

Who should pick which tool

Choose Authoritas if:

• You need AI search monitoring and don't want to pay for a separate SEO platform
• You're tracking brand visibility across multiple AI models and want competitive benchmarking
• You're an eCommerce brand, publisher, or agency managing global campaigns
• You want sentiment analysis to understand how AI models talk about your brand
• You need a platform that's actively maintained and updated

Choose Goodie AI if:

• You can't, because it's not available for purchase

Consider Promptwatch if:

• You want to actually improve your AI visibility, not just monitor it
• You need Answer Gap Analysis to find content opportunities competitors are winning
• You want AI content generation grounded in real citation data
• You need AI crawler logs to see what ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity are reading from your site
• You want prompt intelligence (volumes, difficulty, query fan-outs) to prioritize efforts

Final verdict

This comparison is straightforward: Goodie AI is no longer available, making Authoritas the winner by default.

Even if Goodie AI were still operating, Authoritas would be the better choice. It costs 1/3 the price, tracks more AI models, includes traditional SEO tools, and provides deeper competitive insights. Goodie AI was overpriced for what it delivered.

That said, both platforms share the same fundamental limitation: they're monitoring dashboards, not optimization platforms. They show you where you're invisible in AI search but don't help you fix it. For brands that want to close the loop from insight to action, platforms like Promptwatch fill that gap with content gap analysis, AI content generation, crawler logs, and prompt intelligence.

If you're choosing between Authoritas and Goodie AI specifically: go with Authoritas. If you're evaluating AI visibility platforms more broadly: consider whether you need monitoring-only or monitoring + optimization, then choose accordingly.