Key takeaways
- GetMint's live pricing page currently shows Starter at roughly €74/month billed annually (previously reported at €99), Growth at €299/month, and Enterprise/Agency as custom, but several third-party sites still list older, conflicting numbers.
- Starter now tracks only 2 AI models, not the 3 engines GetMint's own marketing has claimed elsewhere, so verify exact engine coverage before you buy.
- Growth adds unlimited team seats, 5 topics, 300 prompts, and content credits for 6 pieces a month, a meaningful jump over Starter's single content piece.
- Compared to Profound ($99 Starter, ChatGPT only), Peec AI (from roughly €70-89/month), and AthenaHQ ($295/month Starter), GetMint sits in the middle of the pack on price but is one of the few platforms bundling content generation directly into every paid tier.
- If your only goal is monitoring, cheaper tools exist. If you want a platform that also drafts the content needed to close visibility gaps, GetMint's pricing starts to make more sense.
Why GetMint's pricing page keeps changing
Here's the annoying part of researching GetMint: depending on which source you check, you get a different price. The company's own blog post from late 2025 lists Starter at €99/month, Growth at €299/month, and Enterprise at €549/month. G2's listing shows Starter at €99 with 2 seats and Growth at €229. A third-party comparison site quotes Starter at €99 (€79/month annual), Growth at €299 (€239/month annual), and Enterprise starting at €549+.
Then there's the live pricing page itself, which as of this writing shows Starter at roughly €74/month on annual billing (with a "Save €180" banner), Growth still at €299/month, and Enterprise/Agency bumped to fully custom pricing rather than a flat €549. The billing toggle also now advertises a 17% annual discount, not the 20% some older write-ups mention.
None of this is necessarily shady. Early-stage SaaS companies restructure pricing constantly as they learn what customers actually pay for. But it does mean you should never trust a screenshot or a blog post for GetMint pricing. Pull up the live page yourself before you commit, and treat everything below as a snapshot rather than gospel.
GetMint's current plan structure
Based on the live pricing page, here's what each tier actually includes right now.
| Plan | Price | AI models tracked | Prompts | Topics | Content credits | Team seats | Countries |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | ~€74/mo (annual) | 2 | 50 | 2 | 300 (1 content piece/mo) | Unlimited | 1 |
| Growth | €299/mo | 3 | 300 | 5 | 2,000 (6 content pieces/mo) | Unlimited | 3 |
| Enterprise/Agency | Custom | Custom | Custom | Custom | Custom | Custom | Custom |
A few things worth flagging. First, team seats are unlimited on every plan now, including Starter, which is a real change from earlier versions that capped Starter at a single user. Second, Growth's content allowance nearly doubled from what was reported a few months back, from 1,000 credits covering roughly one article to 2,000 credits covering six. Third, Enterprise dropped its published €549 price point entirely in favor of a custom quote, which usually means the actual number depends on how many brands, countries, and prompts you need tracked.
GetMint also offers a free tier for onboarding, no credit card required, but it's built for a one-time scan rather than ongoing monitoring. If you want daily tracking, sentiment analysis, or the Content Studio, you need a paid plan.
What you're actually paying for
The headline features across GetMint's paid tiers are consistent regardless of plan level:
- The GetMint Score, a 0-100 composite of visibility, sentiment, and brand alignment
- Citation Flow, which shows source-level tracking of where AI models are pulling information about your brand
- A GEO Agent that ranks visibility opportunities by potential citation impact
- Content Studio, which drafts content grounded in a "Expertise Library" and configurable "Content Personas," aiming to avoid the generic tone that plagues a lot of AI-generated copy
- AI Shopping tracking (Alexa for shopping) and ChatGPT Ads visibility
- Competition Overview for benchmarking against rivals
The difference between Starter and Growth isn't really about which features you unlock, it's about scope. Starter gives you 2 topics and 50 prompts, which is fine if you're tracking one narrow product category. Growth's 5 topics and 300 prompts make more sense once you're covering multiple product lines or a broader set of buyer questions.
One thing worth double-checking directly with GetMint: their own comparison content claims Starter beats Profound's $99 tier because it covers three engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews) instead of Profound's ChatGPT-only entry plan. But the live pricing page currently lists Starter as tracking only "2 AI models." That's either an unfixed inconsistency in their marketing or a recent downgrade to the entry tier. Either way, don't take the "3 engines for €74" claim at face value until you confirm it in your account.
How GetMint stacks up against dedicated GEO platforms
GEO tool pricing generally runs $10 to $1,000+ per month for self-serve platforms, and GetMint sits comfortably in that range at every tier. Here's how it compares to a few of the more established names.
| Platform | Entry price | Entry-tier engines | Content generation included | Notable limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GetMint | ~€74/mo (Starter) | 2 | Yes, 1 piece/mo on Starter | Pricing has changed multiple times in 2026, hard to pin down |
| Profound | $99/mo (Starter) | 1 (ChatGPT only) | Growth tier and up | Reviewers treat $99 as a funnel to the $399 Growth plan |
| Peec AI | ~€70-89/mo (Starter) | Choose 3 of 6 | No, by design | Must export insights to a separate content tool |
| AthenaHQ | $295/mo (Starter) | 11 models | Advanced Content Optimization Agent is Enterprise-only | Entry price roughly tripled during 2026 (was ~$95) |
| Rank Prompt | ~$39/mo (Starter) | Varies by tier | Limited | Best for very small budgets, shallower dataset |
A few patterns jump out. Profound's actual usable plan for most teams is the $399 Growth tier, not the advertised $99 Starter, since Starter is limited to ChatGPT alone and lacks the Opportunities panel and content agents. Peec AI is the most transparent on per-model add-on pricing (roughly $35-165/month per extra model depending on tier) but explicitly doesn't build content for you. AthenaHQ tripled its entry price at some point in 2026, which tells you these markets are still finding their footing on what a fair entry price actually looks like.
GetMint's positioning, bundling monitoring and content generation into every paid tier including Starter, is genuinely different from Peec AI's monitoring-only approach. Whether that's worth paying for depends on whether you'd otherwise be paying separately for a content tool anyway.
Profound
What the data says about why any of this matters
It's worth stepping back and asking why you'd pay $75-300+ a month for any GEO tool in the first place. Promptwatch's data on citation behavior offers a useful frame: ChatGPT typically cites around 5 sources per web-search-triggered response, while Google AI Overviews and Perplexity cite closer to 10. That means every ChatGPT answer has roughly half the citation "real estate" that AI Overviews offers, making each slot more contested. If you're only going to fight for a handful of citation slots, you want to know which ones you're winning and losing, and that's the entire business case for tools like GetMint, Profound, and Peec AI.
Profound's own research also found that 40-60% of cited domains change monthly across AI answer engines, which argues against treating GEO as a one-off audit. Whatever platform you pick, ongoing tracking beats a single snapshot.
If your organization already runs SEO through 1001 SEO Media or is evaluating an in-house GEO stack, it's worth reading Promptwatch's own breakdown of average sources cited per AI model before choosing a tool, since it directly explains why citation share is harder to win on some engines than others.
Where Promptwatch fits into this comparison
GetMint, Profound, Peec AI, and AthenaHQ are all monitoring-first platforms that have bolted on some content generation. Promptwatch takes a different starting point: it treats monitoring as step one of a longer pipeline that includes crawler log analysis (seeing exactly which AI bots hit your pages and where they fail), citation trend tracking across 22 content types, Reddit and YouTube citation reports, and an automated Content Agent that plans, writes, and publishes GEO-optimized content directly to Webflow, Framer, or WordPress.
Where GetMint's Content Studio drafts content based on RAG grounded in an expertise library, Promptwatch's Unified Actions turns your visibility, citation, and crawler data into a prioritized to-do list, then lets you execute it through Agent Chat or automated publishing rather than just handing you a document. Promptwatch also tracks ChatGPT Shopping recommendations and Ads Radar, plus offsite mentions where your brand gets named inside pages AI cites even without a backlink, both areas none of the GetMint-tier competitors currently cover.
Pricing-wise, Promptwatch's Essential plan starts at $95/month for 1 site, 50 prompts, and 6,000 responses with all LLM tracking included, roughly comparable to GetMint's Starter tier but with broader model coverage from day one. Professional at $245/month adds crawler logs, state and city tracking, and automated content generation, which is the tier most teams graduating past a Starter plan should compare against GetMint's Growth.
Picking the right plan for your budget
A few practical questions to work through before you sign up for any GEO platform, GetMint included:
- How many product lines or topics do you actually need tracked? Starter's 2 topics run out fast if you sell more than one thing.
- Do you need content generation bundled in, or do you already have a content team that just needs the data? If it's the latter, a cheaper monitoring-only tool like Peec AI or Otterly.AI might cost less overall.
- How many countries do you operate in? GetMint's Starter caps you at 1 country, which rules it out for most international brands.
- Will pricing volatility bother you? GetMint has changed its numbers at least three times in the past year based on what different sources report. If you need budget predictability for a full fiscal year, ask for a written quote and lock it in rather than relying on the self-serve checkout.
For a broader look at GEO software options beyond the ones covered here, the directory at bestgeosoftware.com is a reasonable starting point, and if AI rank tracking specifically is your priority, ai-rank-tools.com breaks down tools by that narrower use case.
Bottom line
GetMint's pricing has moved around enough in 2026 that any number you read, including the ones in this guide, should be verified against the live pricing page before you buy. At roughly €74-99/month for Starter and €299/month for Growth, it lands in the middle of the GEO tool market, above Otterly.AI and Rank Prompt's budget tiers but below AthenaHQ's $295 entry point and Profound's real-world $399 Growth plan.
The real differentiator isn't price, it's that GetMint bundles content generation into every paid tier instead of treating it as an upsell. If you specifically need a platform that also produces the articles or pages meant to close your visibility gaps, that's worth the premium over a pure monitoring tool. If you already have a content team and just need reliable tracking, you can likely find something cheaper, and it's worth comparing GetMint directly against Promptwatch, Profound, and Peec AI before committing to an annual contract.