GetMint repriced its GEO platform in 2026: Starter dropped to €74/mo but engine coverage was cut. Here's what each plan actually includes and how it compares to Otterly, Peec, Profound, Scrunch, AthenaHQ, and Promptwatch.
The pattern here is one I'd summarize as trading breadth for a lower entry price. Starter got cheaper, but it lost an engine. Growth stayed at €299, gained prompts (200 to 300), credits (1,000 to 2,000), countries (2 to 3), and moved to unlimited users, but lost engines (4 to 3) and topics (9 to 5). My read: GetMint realized its entry tiers were competing with €70 Peec plans and repriced to stay in the conversation, while nudging serious buyers toward custom Enterprise deals. This volatility isn't unique to GetMint. Peec restructured its entire pricing on August 14, 2026, moving to EUR-denominated annual plans. Profound now bills some tiers annually only. In this category, any pricing article older than a couple of months is probably wrong, so always confirm against live pricing pages before making a decision. ## What you actually get on each plan ### Starter (€74/mo) The Starter plan includes 50 prompts across 2 topics, refreshed daily, tracked on 2 AI models in 1 country, with 5 competitors. You also get the GEO Agent (GetMint's AI strategist), Alexa for Shopping tracking, ChatGPT Ads tracking, and 300 content credits, which works out to roughly one optimized content piece per month. Honest take: this works as a paid audit-plus plan. You'll learn how two engines describe your brand in one market, and whether AI is hallucinating features you don't have. But one content piece a month won't move visibility much on its own. Treat Starter as a diagnostic, not a growth engine. ### Growth (€299/mo) Growth is where GetMint starts to function as a strategy platform. You get 300 prompts, 5 topics, 3 AI engines, 3 countries, 10 competitors, unlimited users, and 2,000 credits (about 6 content pieces per month). The multi-country tracking is the most underrated upgrade here. AI answers genuinely differ by market, and if you sell into more than one country, single-market tools will show you a distorted picture. Six content pieces a month is also enough output to run a real test of whether GEO content moves your citation rates. ### Enterprise and Agency (custom) The custom tier includes custom prompts and topics, API access, a dedicated AI Search strategist, role-based access control, custom workflows, and unlimited brands with brand kits. This is a sales conversation rather than a checkout button, and for agencies managing multiple brands it's the only GetMint tier that scales properly. ## Where GetMint is genuinely different Three things separate GetMint from the pack of prompt trackers: Shopping and ads surfaces. GetMint tracks Alexa for Shopping (Amazon's ecosystem) and ChatGPT Ads on every paid tier. Almost no other GEO platform at this price tracks either surface. If you're an e-commerce brand, shopping recommendations are a revenue surface, not a vanity metric. Promptwatch's ChatGPT shopping feature usage data shows how often shopping recommendations actually appear in ChatGPT search responses, and the share moves enough that any brand selling online should be watching it, not guessing. A content loop, not just dashboards. The Content Studio ties drafting and editing directly to detected visibility gaps, and GetMint claims a distribution network of 150,000+ media partners for placing content that AI models can cite. I can't verify the network size independently, but distribution is the piece most trackers ignore entirely. Hallucination and sentiment checks. GetMint monitors not just whether you're mentioned, but whether the AI describes your product accurately and whether the framing is positive or negative. For brand teams, catching an AI confidently describing a feature you don't have is worth the subscription on its own. ## Where the plans fall short Engine coverage is thin. Two engines on Starter and three on Growth is the weakest part of the lineup. The platform supports ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, but you'll need custom pricing to track them all. Meanwhile RankPrompt gives you 6 engines at $49/mo and Otterly gives you 4 at $29/mo. No AI crawler logs. GetMint shows you citations and mentions, but not the crawl layer underneath: whether GPTBot, ClaudeBot, or PerplexityBot actually visited your pages, what they read, and whether they hit errors. This layer matters more than people realize, because crawler behavior is shifting fast. Promptwatch's research on Meta's web indexer shows Meta-WebIndexer going from roughly 2% to nearly 38% of all tracked AI crawler requests between mid-July and August 9, 2026. The discovery layer under AI answers is being rebuilt in real time, and platforms without crawler logs leave you inferring instead of knowing. No AI traffic attribution. You can see mentions, but not how many visitors and conversions actually arrived from AI platforms. Mentions without traffic data make ROI arguments hard to win internally. No CMS publishing. Content credits produce drafts; you publish them yourself. Compare that with platforms whose agents push content straight into Webflow, Framer, or WordPress on a schedule. ## Why the prompt caps matter Prompt limits feel like a boring line item until you look at how AI answers are actually built. Promptwatch's average sources per response data shows ChatGPT citing roughly 5 sources per web-search response, while Google AI Overviews and Perplexity both sit around 10, with AI Overviews being the steadier of the two. That means each prompt you track is a window onto roughly 5 to 10 citation slots. Fifty prompts on Starter, even refreshed daily, samples a narrow slice of how real buyers phrase questions. This is also why I'd argue engine count is the most overrated number on every GEO pricing page, and prompt volume plus what you can do with the data are the numbers that matter. Most teams over-buy monitoring and under-buy execution. ## GetMint vs the dedicated GEO platforms Here's the full pricing picture across the category: | Platform | Entry price | Entry prompts | Mid tier | Engine coverage at entry | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | GetMint | €74/mo | 50 | €299/mo (300 prompts) | 2 engines | | Otterly.AI | $29/mo | 15 | $189/mo (100 prompts) | 4 engines | | RankPrompt | $49/mo | credit-based | $89/mo (500 credits) | 6 engines | | Peec AI | €70/mo (annual) | ~50 | €180/mo | varies by tier | | Promptwatch | $95/mo | 50 | $245/mo (150 prompts) | all engines | | Profound | $99/mo | 50 | $399/mo (100 prompts) | ChatGPT only | | Scrunch | $250/mo | 125–350 + 1,000 industry | $500/mo (700 prompts) | 4 LLMs | | AthenaHQ | $295/mo | unlimited (credit-metered) | custom | credit-metered | ### Cost per prompt Cost per prompt is the fastest way to compare value, though it hides what's bundled: | Platform | Tier | Price | Prompts | Cost per prompt | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Scrunch | Core | $250–300/mo | 350 | ~$0.86 | | GetMint | Growth | €299/mo | 300 | ~€1.00 | | GetMint | Starter | €74/mo | 50 | ~€1.48 | | Peec AI | Starter (pre-reprice) | $95/mo | 50 | ~$1.90 | | Promptwatch | Essential | $95/mo | 50 | $1.90* | | Otterly.AI | Lite | $29/mo | 15 | ~$1.93 | | Profound | Starter | $99/mo | 50 | ~$1.98 (ChatGPT only) | | Semrush | AI Visibility add-on | $99/mo | 25 | ~$3.96 | *The Promptwatch figure is misleading in its favor: metering is per response (6,000 responses on Essential, so about $0.016 per response), not per prompt, and every engine is tracked. GetMint's Growth plan is genuinely competitive per prompt, especially with content credits and ads tracking bundled. The entry tiers of most competitors get you monitoring only. ### The field, tool by tool Otterly.AI is the cheapest credible entry point: $29/mo for 15 prompts, 4 engines, and unlimited team members, scaling to $489/mo for 400 prompts. Claude, Gemini, and AI Mode are paid add-ons. You leave with charts, not content. [tool:otterly-ai] Peec AI repriced on August 14, 2026 to EUR annual plans: Starter €70/mo, Pro €180/mo, Advanced €360/mo, Enterprise custom. Unlimited seats on every plan is the standout, which GetMint only matches at Growth. Monitoring is solid; execution is thinner. [tool:peec-ai] Profound starts at $99/mo with 1 brand, 50 prompts, ChatGPT only, and 1 seat. Growth at $399/mo adds Perplexity, AI Overviews, and 3 seats; Enterprise scales to 9 engines with API, SSO, and SOC 2. Watch for annual-only billing on some tiers. [tool:profound] Scrunch Core at $250/mo (month-to-month $300) includes 125–350 custom prompts plus 1,000 industry prompts, 3–5 seats, and 4 LLMs. Growth is $500/mo. It has the best cost-per-prompt in the category at